Skip to main content

Lakes Entrance vs Mitchellstown

Property investment comparison - Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909 vs Mitchellstown, VIC 3608

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakes Entrance wins 3, Mitchellstown wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakes EntranceMitchellstown
Median house price$540K$550K
Median unit price$430K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%5.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%5.00%
1-year house growth+4.4%-
3-year house growth+0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.5%
Population5,14571

Lakes Entrance vs Mitchellstown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Lakes Entrance and $550K in Mitchellstown, so Lakes Entrance is the cheaper entry point, with Mitchellstown houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Lakes Entrance sits at a median of $430K against $510K in Mitchellstown, which makes Lakes Entrance the more affordable unit market and Mitchellstown the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mitchellstown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.70%, compared with 4.80% in Lakes Entrance, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lakes Entrance and 1.5% in Mitchellstown, so landlords in Lakes Entrance face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 71, roughly 72 times the size of Mitchellstown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mitchellstown for rental income, Lakes Entrance for a lower purchase price, Lakes Entrance for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison