Skip to main content

Lakes Entrance vs Pirron Yallock

Property investment comparison - Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909 vs Pirron Yallock, VIC 3249

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakes Entrance wins 1, Pirron Yallock wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakes EntrancePirron Yallock
Median house price$540K$530K
Median unit price$430K$250K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%4.53%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%4.68%
1-year house growth+4.4%-
3-year house growth+0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.2%
Population5,145132

Lakes Entrance vs Pirron Yallock: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Lakes Entrance and $530K in Pirron Yallock, so Pirron Yallock is the cheaper entry point, with Lakes Entrance houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Lakes Entrance sits at a median of $430K against $250K in Pirron Yallock, which makes Pirron Yallock the more affordable unit market and Lakes Entrance the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lakes Entrance leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 4.53% in Pirron Yallock, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Pirron Yallock and 1.4% in Lakes Entrance, so landlords in Pirron Yallock face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 132, roughly 39 times the size of Pirron Yallock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakes Entrance for rental income, Pirron Yallock for a lower purchase price, Pirron Yallock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison