Skip to main content

Lakes Entrance vs Smokeytown

Property investment comparison - Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909 vs Smokeytown, VIC 3364

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakes Entrance wins 2, Smokeytown wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakes EntranceSmokeytown
Median house price$540K$545K
Median unit price$430K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%5.42%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%-
1-year house growth+4.4%-
3-year house growth+0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population5,14532

Lakes Entrance vs Smokeytown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Lakes Entrance and $545K in Smokeytown, so Lakes Entrance is the cheaper entry point, with Smokeytown houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Smokeytown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.42%, compared with 4.80% in Lakes Entrance, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lakes Entrance and 1.6% in Smokeytown, so landlords in Lakes Entrance face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 32, roughly 161 times the size of Smokeytown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Smokeytown for rental income, Lakes Entrance for a lower purchase price, Lakes Entrance for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison