Skip to main content

Lamb Range vs Woody Point

Property investment comparison - Lamb Range, QLD 4870 vs Woody Point, QLD 4019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lamb Range wins 4, Woody Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLamb RangeWoody Point
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$420K$925K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%3.34%
1-year house growth-+14.2%
3-year house growth-+47.8%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.6%
Population74,548

Lamb Range vs Woody Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Lamb Range and $1.1M in Woody Point.

For units, Lamb Range sits at a median of $420K against $925K in Woody Point, which makes Lamb Range the more affordable unit market and Woody Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lamb Range leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.00% in Woody Point, a gap of 0.74 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Lamb Range and 1.6% in Woody Point, so landlords in Lamb Range face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woody Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,548 against 7, roughly 650 times the size of Lamb Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lamb Range for rental income, Lamb Range for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison