Lancefield vs Oxley Flats
Property investment comparison - Lancefield, VIC 3435 vs Oxley Flats, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lancefield wins 1, Oxley Flats wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lancefield | Oxley Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $760K | $760K |
| Median unit price | $500K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.31% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Population | 2,743 | 49 |
Lancefield vs Oxley Flats: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $760K in Lancefield and $760K in Oxley Flats.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Lancefield and 2.9% in Oxley Flats, so landlords in Lancefield face less competition for tenants.
Lancefield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,743 against 49, roughly 56 times the size of Oxley Flats; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lancefield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison