Skip to main content

Landsborough vs Mount Lofty

Property investment comparison - Landsborough, QLD 4550 vs Mount Lofty, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Landsborough wins 1, Mount Lofty wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLandsboroughMount Lofty
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.59%
1-year house growth+13.8%+14.9%
3-year house growth+42.1%+51.3%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population4,4463,825

Landsborough vs Mount Lofty: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Landsborough and $1.1M in Mount Lofty, so Mount Lofty is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.8% in Landsborough and +14.9% in Mount Lofty, so recent momentum favours Mount Lofty, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Landsborough houses are +42.1% and Mount Lofty houses +51.3%, so Mount Lofty has compounded faster than Landsborough over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Landsborough and 1.1% in Mount Lofty, so landlords in Landsborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Landsborough is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,446 against 3,825, larger than Mount Lofty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Lofty for a lower purchase price, Mount Lofty for recent price momentum, Landsborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison