Lang Lang vs Officer
Property investment comparison - Lang Lang, VIC 3984 vs Officer, VIC 3809
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lang Lang wins 2, Officer wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lang Lang | Officer |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $755K | $755K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.50% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 4.75% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.9% | +3.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +3.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,556 | 18,503 |
Lang Lang vs Officer: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $755K in Lang Lang and $755K in Officer.
Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Lang Lang and +3.4% in Officer (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lang Lang, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lang Lang and 1.2% in Officer, so landlords in Lang Lang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Officer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,503 against 2,556, roughly 7 times the size of Lang Lang; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lang Lang for recent price momentum, Lang Lang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison