Lang Lang vs Oxley Flats
Property investment comparison - Lang Lang, VIC 3984 vs Oxley Flats, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lang Lang wins 2, Oxley Flats wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lang Lang | Oxley Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $755K | $760K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.50% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +3.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 2.9% |
| Population | 2,556 | 49 |
Lang Lang vs Oxley Flats: what the numbers say
The median house price is $755K in Lang Lang and $760K in Oxley Flats, so Lang Lang is the cheaper entry point, with Oxley Flats houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lang Lang and 2.9% in Oxley Flats, so landlords in Lang Lang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lang Lang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,556 against 49, roughly 52 times the size of Oxley Flats; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lang Lang for a lower purchase price, Lang Lang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison