Langley vs McCrae
Property investment comparison - Langley, VIC 3444 vs McCrae, VIC 3938
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Langley wins 2, McCrae wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Langley | McCrae |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $920K | $785K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.38% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.72% | 4.30% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -7.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -9.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.7% | 4.4% |
| Population | 52 | 3,311 |
Langley vs McCrae: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Langley and $1.2M in McCrae, so Langley is the cheaper entry point, with McCrae houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Langley sits at a median of $920K against $785K in McCrae, which makes McCrae the more affordable unit market and Langley the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.7% in Langley and 4.4% in McCrae, so landlords in Langley face less competition for tenants.
McCrae is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,311 against 52, roughly 64 times the size of Langley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Langley for a lower purchase price, Langley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison