Largs vs Wirlinga
Property investment comparison - Largs, NSW 2320 vs Wirlinga, NSW 2640
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Largs wins 1, Wirlinga wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Largs | Wirlinga |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $880K |
| Median unit price | - | $380K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.18% | 5.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.5% | +11.4% |
| 3-year house growth | +2.0% | +17.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 5.5% |
| Population | 1,962 | 395 |
Largs vs Wirlinga: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Largs and $880K in Wirlinga.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.5% in Largs and +11.4% in Wirlinga, so recent momentum favours Wirlinga, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Largs houses are +2.0% and Wirlinga houses +17.5%, so Wirlinga has compounded faster than Largs over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Largs and 5.5% in Wirlinga, so landlords in Largs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Largs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,962 against 395, roughly 5.0 times the size of Wirlinga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wirlinga for recent price momentum, Largs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison