Skip to main content

Lawnton vs Mount Nebo

Property investment comparison - Lawnton, QLD 4501 vs Mount Nebo, QLD 4520

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lawnton wins 3, Mount Nebo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLawntonMount Nebo
Median house price$975K$970K
Median unit price$680K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.80%
1-year house growth+19.1%+9.1%estimate
3-year house growth+47.0%-
Vacancy rate1.0%2.6%
Population5,905430

Lawnton vs Mount Nebo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $975K in Lawnton and $970K in Mount Nebo, so Mount Nebo is the cheaper entry point, with Lawnton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lawnton sits at a median of $680K against $815K in Mount Nebo, which makes Lawnton the more affordable unit market and Mount Nebo the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.1% in Lawnton and +9.1% in Mount Nebo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lawnton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Lawnton and 2.6% in Mount Nebo, so landlords in Lawnton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lawnton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,905 against 430, roughly 14 times the size of Mount Nebo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Nebo for a lower purchase price, Lawnton for recent price momentum, Lawnton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison