Skip to main content

Lawson vs South Nowra

Property investment comparison - Lawson, NSW 2783 vs South Nowra, NSW 2541

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lawson wins 1, South Nowra wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLawsonSouth Nowra
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price-$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.51%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)2.91%4.30%
1-year house growth+3.7%+10.8%
3-year house growth+17.1%+18.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.2%
Population2,6513,165

Lawson vs South Nowra: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Lawson and $900K in South Nowra.

On cash flow, South Nowra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.51% in Lawson, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.7% in Lawson and +10.8% in South Nowra, so recent momentum favours South Nowra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lawson houses are +17.1% and South Nowra houses +18.6%, so South Nowra has compounded faster than Lawson over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Lawson and 1.2% in South Nowra, so landlords in Lawson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Nowra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,165 against 2,651, larger than Lawson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Nowra for rental income, South Nowra for recent price momentum, Lawson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison