Skip to main content

Leschenault vs Warwick

Property investment comparison - Leschenault, WA 6233 vs Warwick, WA 6024

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Leschenault wins 2, Warwick wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLeschenaultWarwick
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$205K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.85%
Gross rental yield (units)8.31%2.70%
1-year house growth+19.6%estimate-
3-year house growth-+63.6%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.3%
Population3,0583,858

Leschenault vs Warwick: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Leschenault and $1.1M in Warwick, so Warwick is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Leschenault sits at a median of $205K against $630K in Warwick, which makes Leschenault the more affordable unit market and Warwick the pricier one.

On cash flow, Warwick leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.85%, compared with 3.60% in Leschenault, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Warwick and 1.4% in Leschenault, so landlords in Warwick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warwick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,858 against 3,058, larger than Leschenault; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warwick for rental income, Warwick for a lower purchase price, Warwick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison