Skip to main content

Lethbridge Park vs Mount Hutton

Property investment comparison - Lethbridge Park, NSW 2770 vs Mount Hutton, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lethbridge Park wins 4, Mount Hutton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLethbridge ParkMount Hutton
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$465K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.06%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.57%4.82%
1-year house growth+9.8%+10.4%
3-year house growth+38.0%+29.5%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population4,7303,712

Lethbridge Park vs Mount Hutton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Lethbridge Park and $900K in Mount Hutton.

For units, Lethbridge Park sits at a median of $465K against $750K in Mount Hutton, which makes Lethbridge Park the more affordable unit market and Mount Hutton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Lethbridge Park and +10.4% in Mount Hutton, so recent momentum favours Mount Hutton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lethbridge Park houses are +38.0% and Mount Hutton houses +29.5%, so Lethbridge Park has compounded faster than Mount Hutton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Lethbridge Park and 1.0% in Mount Hutton, so landlords in Lethbridge Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lethbridge Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,730 against 3,712, larger than Mount Hutton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Hutton for recent price momentum, Lethbridge Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison