Skip to main content

Lightsview vs Park Holme

Property investment comparison - Lightsview, SA 5085 vs Park Holme, SA 5043

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lightsview wins 4, Park Holme wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLightsviewPark Holme
Median house price$955K$955K
Median unit price$600K$705K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.20%
1-year house growth+12.2%estimate+10.1%
3-year house growth-+31.0%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.8%
Population6,0903,199

Lightsview vs Park Holme: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $955K in Lightsview and $955K in Park Holme.

For units, Lightsview sits at a median of $600K against $705K in Park Holme, which makes Lightsview the more affordable unit market and Park Holme the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Lightsview (an estimate) and +10.1% in Park Holme, so recent momentum favours Lightsview, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Lightsview and 0.8% in Park Holme, so landlords in Lightsview face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lightsview is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,090 against 3,199, larger than Park Holme; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lightsview for recent price momentum, Lightsview for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison