Limekilns vs Wauchope
Property investment comparison - Limekilns, NSW 2850 vs Wauchope, NSW 2446
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Limekilns wins 4, Wauchope wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Limekilns | Wauchope |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $695K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $520K | $615K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.27% | 4.46% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.77% | 4.18% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.2% |
| Population | 115 | 6,589 |
Limekilns vs Wauchope: what the numbers say
The median house price is $695K in Limekilns and $700K in Wauchope, so Limekilns is the cheaper entry point, with Wauchope houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Limekilns sits at a median of $520K against $615K in Wauchope, which makes Limekilns the more affordable unit market and Wauchope the pricier one.
On cash flow, Limekilns leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.27%, compared with 4.46% in Wauchope, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.
Wauchope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,589 against 115, roughly 57 times the size of Limekilns; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Limekilns for rental income, Limekilns for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison