Skip to main content

Limestone Ridges vs Upper Kedron

Property investment comparison - Limestone Ridges, QLD 4305 vs Upper Kedron, QLD 4055

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Limestone Ridges wins 1, Upper Kedron wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLimestone RidgesUpper Kedron
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.26%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.14%
1-year house growth-+12.8%
3-year house growth-+40.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%1.0%
Population1355,800

Limestone Ridges vs Upper Kedron: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Limestone Ridges and $1.4M in Upper Kedron.

On cash flow, Upper Kedron leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.26% in Limestone Ridges, a gap of 0.94 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Limestone Ridges and 1.0% in Upper Kedron, so landlords in Limestone Ridges face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Upper Kedron is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,800 against 135, roughly 43 times the size of Limestone Ridges; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Kedron for rental income, Limestone Ridges for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison