Lindendale vs McGraths Hill
Property investment comparison - Lindendale, NSW 2480 vs McGraths Hill, NSW 2756
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lindendale wins 2, McGraths Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lindendale | McGraths Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.18% | 3.13% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +16.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.4% |
| Population | 263 | 2,537 |
Lindendale vs McGraths Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Lindendale and $1.2M in McGraths Hill, so McGraths Hill is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Lindendale and 1.4% in McGraths Hill, so landlords in Lindendale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
McGraths Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,537 against 263, roughly 10 times the size of Lindendale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: McGraths Hill for a lower purchase price, Lindendale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison