Skip to main content

Lismore Heights vs Long Point

Property investment comparison - Lismore Heights, NSW 2480 vs Long Point, NSW 2800

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lismore Heights wins 2, Long Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLismore HeightsLong Point
Median house price$690K$690K
Median unit price$515K$435K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%4.85%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%5.93%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.4%3.6%
Population2,117237

Lismore Heights vs Long Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $690K in Lismore Heights and $690K in Long Point.

For units, Lismore Heights sits at a median of $515K against $435K in Long Point, which makes Long Point the more affordable unit market and Lismore Heights the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lismore Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.85% in Long Point, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Lismore Heights and 3.6% in Long Point, so landlords in Lismore Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lismore Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,117 against 237, roughly 9 times the size of Long Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lismore Heights for rental income, Lismore Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison