Skip to main content

Lismore Heights vs Macksville

Property investment comparison - Lismore Heights, NSW 2480 vs Macksville, NSW 2447

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lismore Heights wins 4, Macksville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLismore HeightsMacksville
Median house price$690K$695K
Median unit price$515K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%3.94%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+8.0%
3-year house growth-+19.3%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.4%
Population2,1172,782

Lismore Heights vs Macksville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $690K in Lismore Heights and $695K in Macksville, so Lismore Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Macksville houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Lismore Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.30% in Macksville, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Lismore Heights (an estimate) and +8.0% in Macksville, so recent momentum favours Macksville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.4%.

Macksville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,782 against 2,117, larger than Lismore Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lismore Heights for rental income, Lismore Heights for a lower purchase price, Macksville for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison