Skip to main content

Lismore vs Taralga

Property investment comparison - Lismore, NSW 2480 vs Taralga, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lismore wins 4, Taralga wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLismoreTaralga
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price-$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.40%3.41%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%4.28%
1-year house growth+14.6%-4.7%estimate
3-year house growth+46.3%-
Vacancy rate0.2%2.2%
Population3,656403

Lismore vs Taralga: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Lismore and $560K in Taralga.

On cash flow, Lismore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.40%, compared with 3.41% in Taralga, a gap of 1.99 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Lismore and -4.7% in Taralga (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lismore, while Taralga went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Lismore and 2.2% in Taralga, so landlords in Lismore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lismore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,656 against 403, roughly 9 times the size of Taralga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lismore for rental income, Lismore for recent price momentum, Lismore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison