Skip to main content

Lismore vs Tinonee

Property investment comparison - Lismore, NSW 2480 vs Tinonee, NSW 2429

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lismore wins 4, Tinonee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLismoreTinonee
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price-$345K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.40%4.81%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%4.85%
1-year house growth+14.6%-18.2%estimate
3-year house growth+46.3%+100.0%
Vacancy rate0.2%1.6%
Population3,6561,202

Lismore vs Tinonee: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Lismore and $560K in Tinonee.

On cash flow, Lismore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.40%, compared with 4.81% in Tinonee, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Lismore and -18.2% in Tinonee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lismore, while Tinonee went backwards.

Looking back three years, Lismore houses are +46.3% and Tinonee houses +100.0%, so Tinonee has compounded faster than Lismore over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Lismore and 1.6% in Tinonee, so landlords in Lismore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lismore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,656 against 1,202, roughly 3.0 times the size of Tinonee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lismore for rental income, Lismore for recent price momentum, Lismore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison