Skip to main content

Lismore vs Wingham

Property investment comparison - Lismore, NSW 2480 vs Wingham, NSW 2429

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lismore wins 6, Wingham wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLismoreWingham
Median house price$560K$570K
Median unit price-$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.40%4.57%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%5.40%
1-year house growth+14.6%+3.6%
3-year house growth+46.3%+8.5%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.5%
Population3,6565,395

Lismore vs Wingham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $560K in Lismore and $570K in Wingham, so Lismore is the cheaper entry point, with Wingham houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Lismore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.40%, compared with 4.57% in Wingham, a gap of 0.83 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Lismore and +3.6% in Wingham, so recent momentum favours Lismore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lismore houses are +46.3% and Wingham houses +8.5%, so Lismore has compounded faster than Wingham over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Lismore and 0.5% in Wingham, so landlords in Lismore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wingham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,395 against 3,656, larger than Lismore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lismore for rental income, Lismore for a lower purchase price, Lismore for recent price momentum, Lismore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison