Skip to main content

Lithgow vs Molong

Property investment comparison - Lithgow, NSW 2790 vs Molong, NSW 2866

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lithgow wins 5, Molong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLithgowMolong
Median house price$555K$560K
Median unit price-$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%3.33%
1-year house growth+10.0%+2.8%
3-year house growth+16.2%+11.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.6%
Population4,9562,595

Lithgow vs Molong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $555K in Lithgow and $560K in Molong, so Lithgow is the cheaper entry point, with Molong houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.40% in Lithgow and 4.39% in Molong, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Lithgow and +2.8% in Molong, so recent momentum favours Lithgow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lithgow houses are +16.2% and Molong houses +11.9%, so Lithgow has compounded faster than Molong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Molong and 1.1% in Lithgow, so landlords in Molong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lithgow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,956 against 2,595, larger than Molong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lithgow for a lower purchase price, Lithgow for recent price momentum, Molong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Lithgow vs Molong: Property Investment Comparison (2026)