Skip to main content

Lithgow vs South Tamworth

Property investment comparison - Lithgow, NSW 2790 vs South Tamworth, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lithgow wins 1, South Tamworth wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLithgowSouth Tamworth
Median house price$555K$550K
Median unit price-$285K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%6.39%
1-year house growth+10.0%+20.5%
3-year house growth+16.2%+41.7%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.1%
Population4,9566,621

Lithgow vs South Tamworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $555K in Lithgow and $550K in South Tamworth, so South Tamworth is the cheaper entry point, with Lithgow houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Lithgow and +20.5% in South Tamworth, so recent momentum favours South Tamworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lithgow houses are +16.2% and South Tamworth houses +41.7%, so South Tamworth has compounded faster than Lithgow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lithgow and 2.1% in South Tamworth, so landlords in Lithgow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Tamworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,621 against 4,956, larger than Lithgow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Tamworth for a lower purchase price, South Tamworth for recent price momentum, Lithgow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison