Skip to main content

Little Bay vs St Ives Chase

Property investment comparison - Little Bay, NSW 2036 vs St Ives Chase, NSW 2075

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Little Bay wins 4, St Ives Chase wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittle BaySt Ives Chase
Median house price$2.9M$2.9M
Median unit price$1.6M-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.16%1.94%
1-year house growth-1.6%estimate-7.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.0%2.6%
Population4,8173,283

Little Bay vs St Ives Chase: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.9M in Little Bay and $2.9M in St Ives Chase, so Little Bay is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.6% in Little Bay (an estimate) and -7.0% in St Ives Chase (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Little Bay, while St Ives Chase went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Little Bay and 2.6% in St Ives Chase, so landlords in Little Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Little Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,817 against 3,283, larger than St Ives Chase; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Little Bay for a lower purchase price, Little Bay for recent price momentum, Little Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison