Skip to main content

Little Grove vs Morley

Property investment comparison - Little Grove, WA 6330 vs Morley, WA 6062

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Little Grove wins 2, Morley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittle GroveMorley
Median house price$965K$975K
Median unit price-$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.49%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)6.08%5.11%
1-year house growth+15.1%estimate+18.1%
3-year house growth-+66.2%
Vacancy rate1.7%0.7%
Population1,50822,539

Little Grove vs Morley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $965K in Little Grove and $975K in Morley, so Little Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Morley houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Morley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 3.49% in Little Grove, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Little Grove (an estimate) and +18.1% in Morley, so recent momentum favours Morley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Morley and 1.7% in Little Grove, so landlords in Morley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Morley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,539 against 1,508, roughly 15 times the size of Little Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Morley for rental income, Little Grove for a lower purchase price, Morley for recent price momentum, Morley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison