Skip to main content

Little Hampton vs Oakleigh South

Property investment comparison - Little Hampton, VIC 3458 vs Oakleigh South, VIC 3167

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Little Hampton wins 1, Oakleigh South wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittle HamptonOakleigh South
Median house price$1.2M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.29%2.97%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.00%
1-year house growth-+8.6%
3-year house growth-+10.2%
Vacancy rate2.6%1.6%
Population749,851

Little Hampton vs Oakleigh South: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Little Hampton and $1.3M in Oakleigh South, so Little Hampton is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Oakleigh South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 2.29% in Little Hampton, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Oakleigh South and 2.6% in Little Hampton, so landlords in Oakleigh South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oakleigh South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,851 against 74, roughly 133 times the size of Little Hampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oakleigh South for rental income, Little Hampton for a lower purchase price, Oakleigh South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison