Skip to main content

Littlehampton vs Maslin Beach

Property investment comparison - Littlehampton, SA 5250 vs Maslin Beach, SA 5170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Littlehampton wins 2, Maslin Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittlehamptonMaslin Beach
Median house price$970K$955K
Median unit price-$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.82%2.25%
1-year house growth+11.7%+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth+22.6%-
Vacancy rate1.3%2.1%
Population3,3001,213

Littlehampton vs Maslin Beach: what the numbers say

The median house price is $970K in Littlehampton and $955K in Maslin Beach, so Maslin Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Littlehampton houses about 2% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Littlehampton and +11.8% in Maslin Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Maslin Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Littlehampton and 2.1% in Maslin Beach, so landlords in Littlehampton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Littlehampton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 1,213, roughly 2.7 times the size of Maslin Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Maslin Beach for a lower purchase price, Maslin Beach for recent price momentum, Littlehampton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Littlehampton vs Maslin Beach: Suburb Comparison 2026