Littlehampton vs Murrawong
Property investment comparison - Littlehampton, SA 5250 vs Murrawong, SA 5253
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Littlehampton wins 2, Murrawong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Littlehampton | Murrawong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $970K | $980K |
| Median unit price | - | $230K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 2.61% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.82% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +22.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Population | 3,300 | 19 |
Littlehampton vs Murrawong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $970K in Littlehampton and $980K in Murrawong, so Littlehampton is the cheaper entry point, with Murrawong houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Littlehampton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.61% in Murrawong, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Murrawong and 1.3% in Littlehampton, so landlords in Murrawong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Littlehampton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 19, roughly 174 times the size of Murrawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Littlehampton for rental income, Littlehampton for a lower purchase price, Murrawong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison