Littlehampton vs Oakden
Property investment comparison - Littlehampton, SA 5250 vs Oakden, SA 5086
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Littlehampton wins 2, Oakden wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Littlehampton | Oakden |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $970K | $990K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.82% | 4.32% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.7% | +8.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +22.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Population | 3,300 | 3,583 |
Littlehampton vs Oakden: what the numbers say
The median house price is $970K in Littlehampton and $990K in Oakden, so Littlehampton is the cheaper entry point, with Oakden houses about 2% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Littlehampton and +8.5% in Oakden (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Littlehampton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Oakden and 1.3% in Littlehampton, so landlords in Oakden face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Oakden is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,583 against 3,300, larger than Littlehampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Littlehampton for a lower purchase price, Littlehampton for recent price momentum, Oakden for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison