Skip to main content

Littlehampton vs Park Holme

Property investment comparison - Littlehampton, SA 5250 vs Park Holme, SA 5043

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Littlehampton wins 1, Park Holme wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittlehamptonPark Holme
Median house price$970K$955K
Median unit price-$705K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.82%4.20%
1-year house growth+11.7%+10.1%
3-year house growth+22.6%+31.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population3,3003,199

Littlehampton vs Park Holme: what the numbers say

The median house price is $970K in Littlehampton and $955K in Park Holme, so Park Holme is the cheaper entry point, with Littlehampton houses about 2% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Littlehampton and +10.1% in Park Holme, so recent momentum favours Littlehampton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Littlehampton houses are +22.6% and Park Holme houses +31.0%, so Park Holme has compounded faster than Littlehampton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Park Holme and 1.3% in Littlehampton, so landlords in Park Holme face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Littlehampton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 3,199, larger than Park Holme; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Park Holme for a lower purchase price, Littlehampton for recent price momentum, Park Holme for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison