Skip to main content

Littlehampton vs Queenstown

Property investment comparison - Littlehampton, SA 5250 vs Queenstown, SA 5014

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Littlehampton wins 2, Queenstown wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLittlehamptonQueenstown
Median house price$970K$975K
Median unit price-$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.82%-
1-year house growth+11.7%-1.5%
3-year house growth+22.6%+40.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.4%
Population3,3001,943

Littlehampton vs Queenstown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $970K in Littlehampton and $975K in Queenstown, so Littlehampton is the cheaper entry point, with Queenstown houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Littlehampton and -1.5% in Queenstown, so recent momentum favours Littlehampton, while Queenstown went backwards.

Looking back three years, Littlehampton houses are +22.6% and Queenstown houses +40.0%, so Queenstown has compounded faster than Littlehampton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Queenstown and 1.3% in Littlehampton, so landlords in Queenstown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Littlehampton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 1,943, larger than Queenstown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Littlehampton for a lower purchase price, Littlehampton for recent price momentum, Queenstown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison