Skip to main content

Llanarth vs Tuncurry

Property investment comparison - Llanarth, NSW 2795 vs Tuncurry, NSW 2428

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Llanarth wins 2, Tuncurry wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLlanarthTuncurry
Median house price$860K$860K
Median unit price$455K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.95%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%-
1-year house growth+6.6%estimate+4.8%
3-year house growth-+12.2%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.6%
Population2,3026,376

Llanarth vs Tuncurry: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $860K in Llanarth and $860K in Tuncurry.

For units, Llanarth sits at a median of $455K against $600K in Tuncurry, which makes Llanarth the more affordable unit market and Tuncurry the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.95% in Llanarth and 4.00% in Tuncurry, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.6% in Llanarth (an estimate) and +4.8% in Tuncurry, so recent momentum favours Llanarth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Tuncurry and 1.1% in Llanarth, so landlords in Tuncurry face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tuncurry is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,376 against 2,302, roughly 2.8 times the size of Llanarth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Llanarth for recent price momentum, Tuncurry for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison