Locksley vs Noble Park North
Property investment comparison - Locksley, VIC 3665 vs Noble Park North, VIC 3174
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Locksley wins 0, Noble Park North wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Locksley | Noble Park North |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825K | $825K |
| Median unit price | - | $665K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | 3.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.21% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +12.1% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.3% |
| Population | 131 | 7,436 |
Locksley vs Noble Park North: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Locksley and $825K in Noble Park North.
On cash flow, Noble Park North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.81% in Locksley, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.
Noble Park North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,436 against 131, roughly 57 times the size of Locksley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Noble Park North for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Noble Park North, VIC 3174
Open Noble Park North suburb profileRecent sales in Noble Park North
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison