Skip to main content

Loftville vs Moorland

Property investment comparison - Loftville, NSW 2480 vs Moorland, NSW 2443

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Loftville wins 4, Moorland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLoftvilleMoorland
Median house price$585K$580K
Median unit price$450K$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.33%3.88%
Gross rental yield (units)5.39%3.80%
1-year house growth-+3.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%2.0%
Population265516

Loftville vs Moorland: what the numbers say

The median house price is $585K in Loftville and $580K in Moorland, so Moorland is the cheaper entry point, with Loftville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Loftville sits at a median of $450K against $570K in Moorland, which makes Loftville the more affordable unit market and Moorland the pricier one.

On cash flow, Loftville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.33%, compared with 3.88% in Moorland, a gap of 2.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Loftville and 2.0% in Moorland, so landlords in Loftville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moorland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 516 against 265, larger than Loftville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Loftville for rental income, Moorland for a lower purchase price, Loftville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison