Logan Village vs Pinnacles
Property investment comparison - Logan Village, QLD 4207 vs Pinnacles, QLD 4815
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Logan Village wins 1, Pinnacles wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Logan Village | Pinnacles |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $580K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.07% | 2.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.84% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +47.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 0.9% |
| Population | 5,316 | 83 |
Logan Village vs Pinnacles: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Logan Village and $1.3M in Pinnacles.
On cash flow, Logan Village leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.07%, compared with 2.49% in Pinnacles, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Pinnacles and 2.1% in Logan Village, so landlords in Pinnacles face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Logan Village is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,316 against 83, roughly 64 times the size of Pinnacles; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Logan Village for rental income, Pinnacles for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison