Skip to main content

Long Point vs Quakers Hill

Property investment comparison - Long Point, NSW 2564 vs Quakers Hill, NSW 2763

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Long Point wins 2, Quakers Hill wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLong PointQuakers Hill
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$640K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.63%2.63%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%-
1-year house growth-+7.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.8%
Population23727,893

Long Point vs Quakers Hill: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Long Point and $1.4M in Quakers Hill.

For units, Long Point sits at a median of $640K against $900K in Quakers Hill, which makes Long Point the more affordable unit market and Quakers Hill the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.63% in Long Point and 2.63% in Quakers Hill, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Long Point and 1.8% in Quakers Hill, so landlords in Long Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Quakers Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,893 against 237, roughly 118 times the size of Long Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Long Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison