Skip to main content

Long Point vs South Golden Beach

Property investment comparison - Long Point, NSW 2564 vs South Golden Beach, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Long Point wins 2, South Golden Beach wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLong PointSouth Golden Beach
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$640K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.63%3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.10%
1-year house growth-+0.8%
3-year house growth-+5.7%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.2%
Population237887

Long Point vs South Golden Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Long Point and $1.4M in South Golden Beach.

On cash flow, South Golden Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 2.63% in Long Point, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Long Point and 1.2% in South Golden Beach, so landlords in Long Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Golden Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 887 against 237, roughly 3.7 times the size of Long Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Golden Beach for rental income, Long Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison