Skip to main content

Longwarry North vs Waurn Ponds

Property investment comparison - Longwarry North, VIC 3816 vs Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Longwarry North wins 2, Waurn Ponds wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLongwarry NorthWaurn Ponds
Median house price$805K$810K
Median unit price$605K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.01%-
1-year house growth-+5.4%
3-year house growth--4.4%
Vacancy rate0.6%3.7%
Population2304,956

Longwarry North vs Waurn Ponds: what the numbers say

The median house price is $805K in Longwarry North and $810K in Waurn Ponds, so Longwarry North is the cheaper entry point, with Waurn Ponds houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Waurn Ponds leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.13% in Longwarry North, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Longwarry North and 3.7% in Waurn Ponds, so landlords in Longwarry North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waurn Ponds is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,956 against 230, roughly 22 times the size of Longwarry North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waurn Ponds for rental income, Longwarry North for a lower purchase price, Longwarry North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison