Lonsdale vs Somerton Park
Property investment comparison - Lonsdale, SA 5160 vs Somerton Park, SA 5044
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lonsdale wins 2, Somerton Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lonsdale | Somerton Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.6M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | $460K | $770K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 1.87% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 3.90% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.3% |
| Population | 23 | 5,811 |
Lonsdale vs Somerton Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.6M in Lonsdale and $2.2M in Somerton Park, so Somerton Park is the cheaper entry point, with Lonsdale houses about 16% dearer.
For units, Lonsdale sits at a median of $460K against $770K in Somerton Park, which makes Lonsdale the more affordable unit market and Somerton Park the pricier one.
Somerton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,811 against 23, roughly 253 times the size of Lonsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Somerton Park for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison