Lonsdale vs Wattle Park
Property investment comparison - Lonsdale, SA 5160 vs Wattle Park, SA 5066
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lonsdale wins 1, Wattle Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lonsdale | Wattle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.6M | $1.9M |
| Median unit price | $460K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 2.54% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +53.7% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.2% |
| Population | 23 | 1,885 |
Lonsdale vs Wattle Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.6M in Lonsdale and $1.9M in Wattle Park, so Wattle Park is the cheaper entry point, with Lonsdale houses about 34% dearer.
Wattle Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,885 against 23, roughly 82 times the size of Lonsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wattle Park for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison