Skip to main content

Loxford vs Taree

Property investment comparison - Loxford, NSW 2326 vs Taree, NSW 2430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Loxford wins 3, Taree wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLoxfordTaree
Median house price$585K$590K
Median unit price$460K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.52%4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)5.16%5.20%
1-year house growth+21.5%estimate+7.4%
3-year house growth-+12.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.2%
Population4216,715

Loxford vs Taree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $585K in Loxford and $590K in Taree, so Loxford is the cheaper entry point, with Taree houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Loxford sits at a median of $460K against $400K in Taree, which makes Taree the more affordable unit market and Loxford the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.52% in Loxford and 4.51% in Taree, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.5% in Loxford (an estimate) and +7.4% in Taree, so recent momentum favours Loxford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Taree and 2.4% in Loxford, so landlords in Taree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,715 against 42, roughly 398 times the size of Loxford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Loxford for a lower purchase price, Loxford for recent price momentum, Taree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison