Loyetea vs Punchbowl
Property investment comparison - Loyetea, TAS 7316 vs Punchbowl, TAS 7249
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Loyetea wins 2, Punchbowl wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Loyetea | Punchbowl |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $565K | $575K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.49% | 4.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 7.11% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +28.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 20 | 491 |
Loyetea vs Punchbowl: what the numbers say
The median house price is $565K in Loyetea and $575K in Punchbowl, so Loyetea is the cheaper entry point, with Punchbowl houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Loyetea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 4.47% in Punchbowl, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Punchbowl is the bigger suburb, with a population of 491 against 20, roughly 25 times the size of Loyetea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Loyetea for rental income, Loyetea for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison