Skip to main content

Lutwyche vs Mansfield

Property investment comparison - Lutwyche, QLD 4030 vs Mansfield, QLD 4122

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lutwyche wins 1, Mansfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLutwycheMansfield
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$830K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.55%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.15%
1-year house growth+2.7%+14.3%
3-year house growth+31.2%+53.4%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.8%
Population4,6108,851

Lutwyche vs Mansfield: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Lutwyche and $1.5M in Mansfield.

For units, Lutwyche sits at a median of $830K against $815K in Mansfield, which makes Mansfield the more affordable unit market and Lutwyche the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.7% in Lutwyche and +14.3% in Mansfield, so recent momentum favours Mansfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lutwyche houses are +31.2% and Mansfield houses +53.4%, so Mansfield has compounded faster than Lutwyche over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lutwyche and 0.8% in Mansfield, so landlords in Lutwyche face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mansfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,851 against 4,610, larger than Lutwyche; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mansfield for recent price momentum, Lutwyche for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison