Lynam vs Marburg
Property investment comparison - Lynam, QLD 4818 vs Marburg, QLD 4346
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynam wins 1, Marburg wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lynam | Marburg |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $415K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.13% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.86% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +71.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Population | 8 | 1,013 |
Lynam vs Marburg: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Lynam and $1.1M in Marburg, so Marburg is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Lynam and 0.9% in Marburg, so landlords in Lynam face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Marburg is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,013 against 8, roughly 127 times the size of Lynam; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Marburg for a lower purchase price, Lynam for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison