Lyndoch vs Monteith
Property investment comparison - Lyndoch, SA 5351 vs Monteith, SA 5253
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lyndoch wins 1, Monteith wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lyndoch | Monteith |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $830K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.54% | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,151 | 104 |
Lyndoch vs Monteith: what the numbers say
The median house price is $840K in Lyndoch and $830K in Monteith, so Monteith is the cheaper entry point, with Lyndoch houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Lyndoch leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.54%, compared with 3.28% in Monteith, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Monteith and 1.4% in Lyndoch, so landlords in Monteith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lyndoch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,151 against 104, roughly 21 times the size of Monteith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lyndoch for rental income, Monteith for a lower purchase price, Monteith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison