Macclesfield vs Netley
Property investment comparison - Macclesfield, SA 5153 vs Netley, SA 5037
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Macclesfield wins 1, Netley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Macclesfield | Netley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $750K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 4.08% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.6% | +11.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +44.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Population | 1,413 | 1,910 |
Macclesfield vs Netley: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Macclesfield and $1.1M in Netley, so Macclesfield is the cheaper entry point, with Netley houses about 3% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Macclesfield and +11.0% in Netley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Netley, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Netley and 2.1% in Macclesfield, so landlords in Netley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Netley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,910 against 1,413, larger than Macclesfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Macclesfield for a lower purchase price, Netley for recent price momentum, Netley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison