Skip to main content

Maclean vs Woodville

Property investment comparison - Maclean, NSW 2463 vs Woodville, NSW 2324

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maclean wins 4, Woodville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMacleanWoodville
Median house price$680K$685K
Median unit price$440K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.28%4.96%
Gross rental yield (units)5.50%4.97%
1-year house growth+5.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.7%1.3%
Population2,778440

Maclean vs Woodville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $680K in Maclean and $685K in Woodville, so Maclean is the cheaper entry point, with Woodville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Maclean sits at a median of $440K against $530K in Woodville, which makes Maclean the more affordable unit market and Woodville the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woodville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 4.28% in Maclean, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Maclean and 1.3% in Woodville, so landlords in Maclean face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maclean is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,778 against 440, roughly 6 times the size of Woodville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodville for rental income, Maclean for a lower purchase price, Maclean for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison