Skip to main content

Macleay Island vs Mareeba

Property investment comparison - Macleay Island, QLD 4184 vs Mareeba, QLD 4880

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Macleay Island wins 2, Mareeba wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMacleay IslandMareeba
Median house price$575K$570K
Median unit price$800K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.93%
Gross rental yield (units)3.02%-
1-year house growth+13.9%+12.1%
3-year house growth+42.5%+41.8%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.2%
Population3,19311,825

Macleay Island vs Mareeba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $575K in Macleay Island and $570K in Mareeba, so Mareeba is the cheaper entry point, with Macleay Island houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Mareeba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.93%, compared with 4.40% in Macleay Island, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Macleay Island and +12.1% in Mareeba, so recent momentum favours Macleay Island, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Macleay Island houses are +42.5% and Mareeba houses +41.8%, so Macleay Island has compounded faster than Mareeba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.2%.

Mareeba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,825 against 3,193, roughly 3.7 times the size of Macleay Island; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mareeba for rental income, Mareeba for a lower purchase price, Macleay Island for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison